Texas Wildlife Management and Appraisal Print
In November 1995, Texas voters approved Proposition 11 which amended Article VIII,
Section 1-d-1, of the Texas Constitution to permit productivity appraisal for land used to
manage wildlife.
House Bill (H.B.) 1358 implemented the constitutional amendment by adding wildlife
management as an agricultural use that qualifies the land for agricultural (productivity)
appraisal in Property Tax Code Section 23.51.
H.B. 1358 required the Comptroller — with the help of the Texas Parks and Wildlife
Department and the Texas A & M Extension Service — to issue guidelines to county
appraisal districts (CADs) on how to qualify and appraise land used to manage wildlife for
agricultural appraisal. The Comptroller's Property Tax Division has distributed interim
guidelines to county appraisal districts. You can obtain a copy by writing the Property
Tax Division at the following address:
Property Tax Division P. 0. Box 13528 Austin, Texas 78711-3528
You can also call the toll-free number, (800) 252-9121 or 305-9999 in Austin. These
guidelines will be revised in the future to accommodate changes in law, circumstances or in
light of new information.
This article reviews the requirements for qualifying land for wildlife management, for
initially appraising the land, and for defining elements of the seven wildlife management
activities. Chapter 23, Subchapter D, of the Property Tax Code addresses the
qualifications for agricultural appraisal and the appraisal of qualified agricultural
land. Land used for wildlife management must meet all the legal requirements of land
qualified for agricultural appraisal. Land on which the owner engages in wildlife
management and meets other requirements for agricultural appraisal is qualified for
agricultural appraisal and is technically in agricultural use. To simplify terms, however,
this article refers to agricultural land used for wildlife management as land in wildlife
management use.
-
Wildlife Management Use Qualifications
-
Management Activities Required By Law
-
Principal Issues
-
Questions & Answers
-
The Appraisal Process
- Prior Year
- The first requirement for wildlife management use qualification is purely technical
and is not related to the land's actual use to manage wildlife. The law restricts
what land may qualify for wildlife management use. To qualify for agricultural
appraisal under the wildlife management use, the property owner must have qualified
the land for agricultural appraisal under Chapter 23, Subchapter D Tax Code (also
called 1-d-1 or open space agricultural appraisal), at the time the owner changes
the land's use to wildlife management use. In other words, the owner must have
qualified the land for agricultural appraisal during the year before the year the
owner changes to the wildlife management use. For example, an owner who wishes to
qualify for wildlife management use in 1996 must show that the land was qualified
for and appraised as agricultural land in 1995.
- Current Use
- The second requirement for qualified wildlife management use is that the owner must
use the land to propagate a sustaining breeding, migrating, or wintering population
of indigenous wild animals.
Land may qualify for wildlife management use if it is instrumental in supporting a
sustaining breeding, migrating, or wintering population. The group of animals need
not permanently live on the land provided they regularly migrate across the land or
seasonally live there.
A sustaining breeding population is a group of indigenous wild animals large enough
to live independently over several generations. This definition implies that the
population will not die out because it produces enough animals to continue as a
viable group. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department may be able to provide
information to help determine the number of animals of a particular species that
must group together to sustain the population.
The law requires an owner to propagate the wildlife population for human use.
Human use may include food, medicine or recreation. Using animals for food and
medicine is self-explanatory. Food and medicine uses result in products and
require active participation. A recreational use may be either active or passive
and may include any type of use for pleasure or sport. Birdwatching, hiking,
hunting, photography, and other non-passive recreational or hobby-type activities
are qualifying recreational uses. An owner's passive enjoyment in owning and
managing the land for wildlife is a qualifying recreational use.
Under the law, an owner must perform at least three of seven wildlife management
activities on the land. An owner may qualify by doing more than three of the listed
activities, but may not engage in fewer than three.
Next is a short summary of each management activity listed in the law.
- Habitat Control (Habitat Management) — A wild animal's habitat
is its surroundings as a whole, including plants, ground cover, shelter, and other
animals on the land. Habitat control, or habitat management, means actively using
the land to eate or promote an environment that is beneficial to wildlife on the
land. Removing harmful parts of the environment when necessary to benefit wildlife
is also habitat management.
- Erosion Control — Any active practice that attempts to reduce
or keep soil erosion to a minimum for the benefit of wildlife is erosion
control.
- Predator Control (Predator Management) — This term means
practices intended to manage the population of predators to benefit the owner's
target wildlife population. Predator control is usually not necessary unless the
number of predators is harmful to the desired wildlife population.
- Providing Supplemental Supplies of Water — Natural water
exists in all wildlife environments. Supplemental water is provided when the owner
actively provides water in addition to the natural sources.
- Providing Supplemental Supplies of Food — Most wildlife
environments have some natural food. An owner supplies supplemental food by
providing food and nutrition in addition to the level naturally produced on the
land.
- Providing Shelter — This term means actively creating or
maintaining vegetation or artificial structures that provide shelter from the
weather, nesting and breeding sites, or "escape cover" from enemies.
- Making Census Counts to Determine Population — Census counts
are periodic surveys and inventories to determine the number, composition, or other
relevant information about a wildlife population to measure if the current wildlife
management practices are serving the targeted species.
Chief appraisers should remember that an owner's wildlife management use must meet all
the requirements to qualify for agricultural use, defined in Section 23.51(1), TaxCode.
The following is a short discussion of the principal issues involved in agricultural use of
land used for wildlife management. For a thorough discussion of these components, please
refer to the Comptroller's Manual for the Appraisal of Agricultural Land.
Primary Use
The law requires agriculture to be the primary use of the land. Wildlife management is
an agricultural use under the law. The primary use requirement is particularly important
for land used to manage wildlife. For example, land devoted to wildlife management can be
used as a residence for the owner. But the land will not qualify if residential use — and
not wildlife management — is the land's primary use.
The chief appraiser must gather and consider all the surrounding facts to determine
whether the land is primarily used to manage wildlife. Some relevant questions include:
- Is the owner implementing an active, written wildlife management plan that shows
the owner is engaging in all the activities necessary to preserve a sustaining
breeding population on the land? While the law does not require the owner to have
a management plan, a plan is clear evidence of the owner's use of the land
primarily for wildlife management. A good plan will usually list wildlife
management activities with the appropriate seasons and the sequence of events.
- Do the owner's management practices emphasize managing the population to ensure its
continued existence over another use of the land? For example, does the owner
refrain from allowing visitors on the land in years when the habitat is
sensitive?
- Has the owner engaged in the wildlife management practices necessary to sustain and
encourage growth of the population? In some cases, an owner must control predators
and supply water when water is not adequate, supply shelter and food when natural
food production is not adequate, and establish vegetation to control erosion. In
other cases, less active management may maintain and encourage the growth of
wildlife.
- Are there improvements — appropriate fencing for example — necessary to control or
sustain the wildlife population? The owner may use land for purposes that are
secondary to the primary use of wildlife management if the secondary use is
compatible with the primary use. For example, an owner may engage in wildlife
management and also operate a business in which birdwatchers stay on the land
overnight and watch for birds during the day (known as a bird-and-breakfast
operation). This activity is secondary to the primary activity of managing the
wildlife, but it is not incompatible with the wildlife management use. General
principles of primary and secondary use are discussed in the Manual for the
Appraisal of Agricultural Land.
Degree of Intensity
The degree of intensity standard for wildlife management land is determined in the same
way as other agricultural uses. Wildlife management land usually requires management of
the land that encourages long-term maintenance of the population.
A chief appraiser may ask questions such as whether fencing is typical in the area for
managing the target population, and what is the typical population size. In addition, the
chief appraiser should ask how many of the following activities are typical in the area (or
are typical for the area during some parts of the year): habitat management, predator
management, erosion control, providing supplemental supplies of food or water, providing
shelter, and engaging in census counts.
Because wildlife management activities are elements of the degree of intensity
determination, the owner must be engaging in three of seven principles of the degree of
intensity test are discussed in the Manual for the Appraisal of Agricultural
Land.
History of Use
The land must have qualified for 1-d-1 agricultural use and have been appraised as 1-d-1
agricultural land in the year before the owner changes use to wildlife management.
Consequently, the time period test to determine if the land has been used for agriculture
for five of the preceding seven years is usually not necessary.
- Revenue Neutral
- The wildlife management use is a revenue neutral use of land, meaning that the
owner who switches from another agricultural use to wildlife management use must initially pay the same amount of property taxes that would have been paid if the land had remained in its former agricultural use category.
Land qualified for wildlife management should be placed in a wildlife management
category, but should have the same appraised value as before conversion to wildlife
management use. For example, if the land was in Irrigated Cropland 1 before the
owner switched its use to wildlife management, the land should be placed in the
wildlife management category, but will be appraised at the Irrigated Cropland 1
value.
- Application
- The law does not require an annual application for agricultural use once the land
has qualified. Because only 1-d-1 qualified land may qualify for wildlife
management use, the owner who changes to this use need not reapply for agricultural
appraisal.
The law, however, does require an owner who changes the category of agricultural use
to notify the chief appraiser of the change of use. When an owner changes
agricultural use to wildlife management, the owner must notify the chief appraiser
in writing before May 1 of the year in which the owner wants to qualify under
wildlife management use. The chief appraiser will then determine if the land
qualifies for wildlife management use. Likewise, an owner must notify the chief
appraiser if land is switched from wildlife management use to another qualifying
agricultural use.
Owners should contact their county appraisal districts about notification
requirements before changing the use of small portions of their land from one
qualified agricultural use to another. For example, if an owner builds a 10-acre
pond to supply supplemental water on a 1000-acre tract, the owner should ask about
the appraisal district's need for notification and documentation requirements.
Q: Is land qualified for timber appraisal or agricultural
appraisal under Article VIII, Section l-d, of the Texas Constitution eligible to qualify
for wildlife management use?
A: No. Timber land is qualified under Tax Code, Chapter 23,
Subchapter E, and 1-d agricultural land is qualified under Subchapter C. The law limits
wildlife management use to 1-d-1 or open-space agricultural land qualified under Subchapter
D of Chapter 23.
Q: What is an indigenous animal?
A: An indigenous animal is one that originated in or naturally
migrates through an area and is living naturally in that area, as opposed to an exotic
animal or one that has been introduced to the area. In this context, an indigenous animal
is one that is native to Texas.
Q: What is a migrating or wintering population?
A: A migrating population of indigenous wild animals is a group of
animals moving between seasonal ranges. A wintering population of indigenous wild animals
is a group of animals living on their winter range.
|